<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.1.2" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Barren Blogs</title>
	<link>http://www.letterlover.net/2009/06/10/barren-blogs/</link>
	<description>Where the written word lives on...</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 17 May 2012 15:11:51 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.1.2</generator>

	<item>
		<title>By: Stephanie</title>
		<link>http://www.letterlover.net/2009/06/10/barren-blogs/#comment-16105</link>
		<author>Stephanie</author>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Jun 2009 08:37:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.letterlover.net/2009/06/10/barren-blogs/#comment-16105</guid>
					<description>What a weird article. I think I've come to the conclusion that NYTimes and I don't have the same points of view at all. The writer only goes from the perspective of "having an audience" or "making money" from a blog, and because people don't get that, they stop blogging.

But what if you just want to write and share things, and that's why you blog? You're less likely to give it up that way, and less likely to be disappointed when you don't get attention.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What a weird article. I think I&#8217;ve come to the conclusion that NYTimes and I don&#8217;t have the same points of view at all. The writer only goes from the perspective of &#8220;having an audience&#8221; or &#8220;making money&#8221; from a blog, and because people don&#8217;t get that, they stop blogging.</p>
<p>But what if you just want to write and share things, and that&#8217;s why you blog? You&#8217;re less likely to give it up that way, and less likely to be disappointed when you don&#8217;t get attention.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Samara</title>
		<link>http://www.letterlover.net/2009/06/10/barren-blogs/#comment-16125</link>
		<author>Samara</author>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Jun 2009 17:29:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.letterlover.net/2009/06/10/barren-blogs/#comment-16125</guid>
					<description>Excellent point Stephanie. I hadn't read the article that way. Although it is quite glaring now that you mention it. You should write for Gawker/Jezebel =) And I agree, if you get some personal satisfaction out of blogging then you’re less likely to give it up. I will, no doubt, print my blog and have it stand as an extension of my journal someday—regardless of whether it made me money or had millions of readers. 

And then there’s this part (our conversation) that is one great bonus of blogging!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Excellent point Stephanie. I hadn&#8217;t read the article that way. Although it is quite glaring now that you mention it. You should write for Gawker/Jezebel =) And I agree, if you get some personal satisfaction out of blogging then you’re less likely to give it up. I will, no doubt, print my blog and have it stand as an extension of my journal someday—regardless of whether it made me money or had millions of readers. </p>
<p>And then there’s this part (our conversation) that is one great bonus of blogging!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sandra</title>
		<link>http://www.letterlover.net/2009/06/10/barren-blogs/#comment-24592</link>
		<author>Sandra</author>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Dec 2009 10:20:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.letterlover.net/2009/06/10/barren-blogs/#comment-24592</guid>
					<description>great post. I would love to follow you on twitter. By the way, did you guys know that some Iranian hacker had hacked twitter yesterday.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>great post. I would love to follow you on twitter. By the way, did you guys know that some Iranian hacker had hacked twitter yesterday.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>

